USPTO serial 76714706
DINERS KITCHEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DINERS KITCHEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Laval, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Jeffries
STEPHEN J. JEFFRIES Holland & Knight, LLP800 17TH ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-3962UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Cooking ovens, namely, burger ovens; electric grills, namely, burger grills; electric food steamers, namely, hot dog steamers; deep fat fryers; electric rice cookers; electric food steamers; ice cream makers; baking ovens, namely, pizza ovens; electric dehydrators; electric pressure cookers; electric oval pressure cookers; electric panini press grills; electric raclette grills; electric crepe makers; electric skillets; electrical grills; electric fondue sets, namely, fondue pots, electric burners and forks sold as a unit; electrio toaster ovens; toasters; electric popcorn makers, namely, popcorn poppers; electric coffee makers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |