Drawing for WILLIAM BRANHAM

USPTO serial 76975401

WILLIAM BRANHAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WILLIAM BRANHAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel J. Lueders

DANIEL J LUEDERS NAUGHTON, MORIARTY & MCNETTBANK ONE CTR TWR111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009audio tapes, namely, prerecorded audio tapes featuring religious musical sermons and sermons; and compact discs featuring religious musical sermons and sermonsABANDONEDDec 28, 1959

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2004ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 10, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 10, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 14, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance