Drawing for DON'T COPY. LEAD.

USPTO serial 76977165

DON'T COPY. LEAD.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DON'T COPY. LEAD.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SUSAN L. MIZER

SUSAN L MIZER TUCKER, ELLIS & W LLP1150 HUNTINGTON BLDG925 EUCLID AVECLEVELAND, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING AN ON-LINE WEBSITE FEATURING INFORMATION ON BUSINESS AND OFFICE MACHINERY, NAMELY, PROVIDING PRODUCT, MARKETING, SALES, REPAIR, AND DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION TO DEALERS OF COPIERS, FAX MACHINES, MULTIFUNCTION COMPUTER PERIPHERALS AND OFFICE EQUIPMENTACTIVEOct 30, 2000
042TECHNICAL AND PRODUCT SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COPIERS, PRINTERS, FAX MACHINES, TONER, AND MULTIFUNCTION COMPUTER PERIPHERALS VIA TELEPHONE, E-MAIL, AND IN PERSONACTIVEOct 30, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 1, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2004CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 17, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 12, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 30, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 30, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 30, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 29, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 30, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 7, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 31, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 27, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance