USPTO serial 76977550
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Shu Lin Town, Taipei Hsien, TW
Shu Lin Town, Taipei Hsien, TW
Shu Lin Town, Taipei Hsien, TW
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William E. Levin
AMANDA V DWIGHT DWIGHT LAW GROUP234 E 17TH ST STE 105-ACOSTA MESA, CA 92627UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for optimizing the display quality and performance of computer monitors and for security monitoring and video conferencing system applications and computer hardware, namely computer monitors, computer operating systems, and computer peripherals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 16, 1996 |
| 037 | Computer installation and repair | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems via telephone, e-mail, and in person | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 18, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |