Drawing for BBS-TEK

USPTO serial 76978120

BBS-TEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3361273Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 1, 2008
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with BBS-TEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maria v. Hardison

MARIA V. HARDISON Tassan & Hardison4143 27th Street N.Arlington, VA 22207-5211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012reversing alarms for vehicles and mobile plant and machineryACTIVE—
037[ repair, maintenance, fitting and installation of reversing alarms, emergency sirens and horns for vehicles and mobile plant and machinery ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2017RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Dec 30, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Dec 29, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2017REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 6, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 24, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2014NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED—
Apr 11, 2014C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 11, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 27, 2014815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 27, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 10, 2007FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Sep 7, 2007ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Oct 20, 2006FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Aug 18, 2006ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 25, 2006MNDANOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED—
Jul 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 19, 2006ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 5, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 23, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2004AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Mar 30, 2004PRA7REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED—
Feb 10, 2004AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Dec 24, 2003AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Dec 24, 2003AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Nov 6, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 5, 20031.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Mar 4, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance