USPTO serial 76979089
TALISKER MOUNTAIN, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3866217Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 26, 2010
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TALISKER MOUNTAIN, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicole M. Deforge
NICOLE M. DEFORGE VAN COTT, BAGLEY, CORNWALL & MCCARTHY36 SOUTH STATE STREETSUITE 1900SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-1478Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Real estate development services in connection with commercial and residential properties | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Talisker Mountain Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Talisker Mountain Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Talisker Mountain Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named TALISKER MOUNTAIN, INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |