USPTO serial 76979102
THE FRONT ROW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE FRONT ROW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer S. Sickler
JENNIFER S SICKLER THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP333 CLAY ST STE 3300HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Radio broadcasting and radio program broadcasting not including Christian, gospel, and inspirational music; communication services, namely, transmitting streamed audio material through media of cable and satellite systems, the Internet, and portable and wireless devices | ACTIVE | Jan 19, 2004 |
| 041 | Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing radio programs in the field of theater, comedians, classical music, musicals, films, videos, dance, and opera, not including Christian, gospel, and inspirational music; and educational services, namely, panel discussions with faculty, musicians, singers, and music professionals in the field of music, theater, musicals, films, opera, and dance, not including Christian, gospel, and inspirational music | ACTIVE | Jan 19, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2013 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2013 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |