Drawing for ANPATH

USPTO serial 77004809

ANPATH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FATHY, DOMINIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANPATH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lauri S. Thompson

Lauri S. Thompson Greenberg Traurig, LLP3773 Howard Hughes ParkwaySuite 500NLas Vegas, NV 89169

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005All purpose disinfectant cleaning preparations for household, commercial and industrial useACTIVEJul 19, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 28, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 28, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 13, 2010EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 17, 2009GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2009GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2009CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN—
Dec 1, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 1, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 1, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 27, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2009CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Jul 21, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 1, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2009CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 16, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2008CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 27, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 19, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 19, 2008EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 14, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 13, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 13, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 13, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 19, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance