Drawing for DIGISENSE

USPTO serial 77020539

DIGISENSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGISENSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Slafsky

John L. Slafsky WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer storage devices, namely, specialized computer appliances for automatic backup, archiving, indexing, searching, recovery and viewing of dataACTIVE—
042Rental of appliances, namely, specialized computer appliances for automatic backup, archiving, indexing, searching, recovery and viewing of electronic dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 6, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 4, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 4, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 29, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 21, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 21, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 21, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 21, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 24, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 24, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 6, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 4, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 4, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 4, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 12, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance