Drawing for GLO-E

USPTO serial 77021814

GLO-E

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLO-E?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul W. Mussell

PAUL W MUSSELL DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 S 6TH ST STE 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1498UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lighting Fixtures; Novelty Lamps; Electric String Lights for Decorating; Flashing Strobe Light ApparatusACTIVEAug 23, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 28, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 28, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 25, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 25, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 31, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 31, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 29, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2006AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 15, 2006EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 19, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance