USPTO serial 77022553
ORGANIC ESSENTIALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORGANIC ESSENTIALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Schachter
ROBERT A SCHACHTER ROBINSON BROG LEINWAND GREENE, ET AL1345 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 31NEW YORK, NY 10105-0302UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing for men, women, boys, girls, toddlers and infants, namely shirts, t-shirts, tops, blouses, hooded tops, sweaters, cardigans, vests, sweat shirts, sweat pants, pants, jeans, capris, shorts, skirts, dresses, gowns, jumpers, overalls, jumpsuits, jogging suits, suits, blazers, jean jackets, sport jackets, tuxedos, coats, leather coats, parkas, pullovers, raincoats, skiwear, swimwear, beachwear, underwear, boxer shorts, lingerie, bathrobes, nightgowns, pajamas, layette, sleepers, one piece garment for infants and toddlers, rompers, smocks, fabric diapers, bibs, namely, cloth bibs, children's cloth eating bibs, plastic baby bibs, ski bibs, coveralls, booties, hosiery, socks, tights, leggings, hats, caps, visors, headbands, earmuffs, sweat bands, belts, suspenders, ties, bow ties, mittens, gloves, scarves, shawls, shoes, slippers, boots, sandals, athletic footwear, athletic uniforms and school uniforms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 3, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |