USPTO serial 77023485
CHIBOLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHIBOLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Rogero
David M. Rogero David M. Rogero, P.A.2625 Ponce de Leon Blvd., Ste. 280Coral Gables, FL 33134UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Bath linen; Bed blankets; Bed linen; Children's blankets | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Aprons; Athletic shoes; Baby bunting; Bathing suits; Garment belts; Belts; Bib overalls; Bibs not of cloth or paper; Blazers; Blouses; Body suits; Bonnets; Boots; Camp shirts; Caps; Children's and infants' cloth bibs; Children's cloth eating bibs; Children's headwear; Cloth bibs; Coats; Creepers; Culottes; Denims; Dress shirts; Dress suits; Dresses; Dusters; Fabric belts; Foulards; Gloves; Golf shirts; Hats; Head bands; Head scarves; Hoods ; Hosiery; Infant and toddler one piece clothing; Infants' shoes and boots; Jackets; Jerseys; Jogging pants; Jumpers; Knit shirts; Layettes; Leather belts; Leather shoes; Leggings; Leotards; Mittens; Mufflers ; Mules; Night gowns; Night shirts; Open-necked shirts; Over coats; Overalls; Pajamas; Pants; Parts of clothing, namely, gussets for tights, gussets for stockings, gussets for bathing suits, gussets for underwear, gussets for leotards and gussets for footlets; Piquet shirts; Play suits; Polo shirts; Rain coats; Robes; Rompers; Sandals; Scarves; Shawls; Shawls and headscarves; Shifts ; Shirts; Shirts for suits; Shoes; Short sets; Short trousers; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; Short-sleeved shirts; Shorts; Shoulder wraps; Skirt suits; Skirts; Skirts and dresses; Slacks; Sleep shirts; Sleeping garments; Sleepwear; Slippers; Slips; Socks; Socks and stockings; Sport coats; Sport shirts; Sports shirts; Sports shirts with short sleeves; Stockings; Suit coats; Suits; Suspenders; Swaddling clothes; Sweat pants; Sweat shirts; Sweat suits; Sweaters; Swim wear; Swimming trunks; T-shirts; Tank tops; Thongs; Ties ; Tights; Top coats; Tops ; Trench coats; Underwear; Vested suits; Vests; Visors; Wraps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |