Drawing for DREAMGIRL

USPTO serial 77030085

DREAMGIRL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DREAMGIRL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cheryl L. Burbach

Cheryl L. Burbach and Scott Brown Hovey Williams LLP10801 Mastin Blvd.Suite 1000Overland Park, KS 66210

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary, natural, holistic and nutritional food supplements, energy bars for use as a meal replacement, meal replacement drinks, meal replacement bars, protein shakes for use as a dietary supplement, protein bars for use as a dietary supplement; nutritional supplements in the nature of non-prescription vitamins; vitamin food supplements, namely muscle building powders and metabolic enhancement drinks and tablets for use in exercise, nutrition, bodybuilding and weight training; non-prescription preparations to promote weight gain, non-prescription preparations to promote weight loss, non-prescription preparations to promote muscle growth; non-prescription metabolic preparations to promote fat burning; non-prescription metabolic preparations to block carbohydrate absorptionACTIVE—
029Fruit-and-nut based, soy-based, and protein-based energy barsACTIVE—
030Grain-based, cereal-based, and granola-based energy barsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 22, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 15, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 22, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 22, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 23, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 23, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 30, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 23, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2008ISPOWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST—
Jan 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 26, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 31, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance