Drawing for FRUSEN GLADJE

USPTO serial 77033862

FRUSEN GLADJE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3595300Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 24, 2009
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRUSEN GLADJE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodore R. Remaklus

NORTH AMERICAN BRANDS LLC15 EAST OAK AVENUEMOORESTOWN, NJ 08507UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Ice creamSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDMar 27, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2013C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Nov 19, 2013CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 14, 2013CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Aug 19, 2013PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 24, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 13, 2009REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 12, 2009CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Feb 12, 2009SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 12, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 28, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 28, 2009EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 23, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 23, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 29, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 28, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance