USPTO serial 77040558
BLACK HORSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLACK HORSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Russell
JOHN E RUSSELL ALLMARK TRADEMARK4041 SUGAR MAPLE DR STE ADANVILLE, CA 94506-4640UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Sauces, spice blends, dry rubs for meats and fish, marinades, dipping sauces, and glazes for meats and fish | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 28, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |