USPTO serial 77051549
MED E
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MED E?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew P. Bridges
ANDREW P BRIDGES WINSTON & STRAWN LLP101 CALIFORNIA ST STE 3900SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5894UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Healthcare industry business consulting and advisory services; business management consultation and advisory services, namely, business intelligence, business prediction, business analytics, web analytics and business performance management services; business management consultation and advisory services in the fields of productivity, revenue, profitability, market analysis, marketing; business management consultation and advisory services relating to revenue cycle management; business management consulting and advisory services relating to revenue growth, assessment of revenue growth opportunities, and development and execution of revenue growth plans; business consulting services, namely, data collection, aggregation, analysis and rating of business markets and business benchmarking services in connection with financial operations in the health care industry; analyzing and compiling data for measuring clinical performance for business forecasting and analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Risk management services, namely, providing information and data in the field of credit and financial information; risk management services, namely, risk segmentation analysis for the health care industry; risk management consultation, namely, providing risk benchmarking; providing information and advice in the field of credit and financial information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer, information technology, and application service provider services, namely, hosting computer software applications for use by others for business planning, monitoring, analysis, web analytics, management and productivity; computer and information technology services, namely, acting as an application service provider by hosting computer application software for creating searchable databases of information and data in the fields of financial, accounting, enterprise management information, business analytics and business management analytics; database management services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for searching and retrieving information from databases and computer networks; information technology consultation services for use in risk management and regulatory compliance by hospital systems, third-party payors, professionals, and management in the healthcare field | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Analysis of data, policy and process, and provision of business management advice and assistance to ensure compliance with healthcare and fair credit reporting related laws and regulations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MedeAnalytics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MedeFinance, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MedeFinance, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named MED E
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |