USPTO serial 77053014
RTOWNCARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RTOWNCARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Carson City, NV
Carson City, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne H. Peck
ANNE H. PECK COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP777 6th Street, NWSuite 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20001-2421Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Magnetically coded credit and debit cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, non-magnetically coded credit and debit cards; printed traveler's checks; printed coupons placed in publications; and related advertising in such publications | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, credit card services, debit card services, travelers check services, electronic funds and currency transfer services, travel financial assistance services, disbursement and transaction authorization and settlement services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Walter, Richard
- Other trademarks owned by Walter, Richard
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named RTOWNCARD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |