Drawing for HY-VEE FUNPAWS

USPTO serial 77056110

HY-VEE FUNPAWS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HY-VEE FUNPAWS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy J. Zarley

Timothy J. Zarley ZARLEY LAW FIRM, P.L.C.CAPITAL SQUARE, SUITE 200400 LOCUST STREETDES MOINES, IA 50309-2350

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Pet beds and cratesACTIVEOct 14, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 20, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 20, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 18, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 18, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 18, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 26, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 27, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance