USPTO serial 77063138
AMATECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3583811Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 3, 2009
- Examiner
- HINES, REGINA C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AMATECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Advanced Micromechanic and Automation Technology
Co. Mayo, IE
Other trademarks owned by Advanced Micromechanic and Automation Technology
TOURMAKEADY, COUNTY MAYO, IE
Advanced Micromechanic and Automation Technology
Tourmakeady, IE
Other trademarks owned by Advanced Micromechanic and Automation Technology
Advanced Micromechanic and Automation Technology
Tourmakeady, IE
Other trademarks owned by Advanced Micromechanic and Automation Technology
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard M. Cohn
Howard M. Cohn HOWARD M. COHN PATENT ATTORNEY LLC21625 CHAGRIN BLVD STE 220CLEVELAND, OH 44122-5335UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Programmable passive and active radio frequency identification products, namely, transponders in the nature of smart cards featuring an embedded microchip connected to an antenna for use in access control applications, identification, storing and retrieving electronic data value, automatic fare collection, vending and micro-payment transactions; transponders in the nature of a token apparatus resembling a conventional USB memory fob for data storage; transponders in the form of key fobs featuring an embedded microchip for use in access control applications, as electronic keys, for cash less vending applications, for customer loyalty, electronic couponing, event ticketing and identification schemes; transponders in the nature of a fob and card featuring an embedded microchip and biometric identifier for verification of personal credentials and privileges; transponders in the nature of disc tags featuring an embedded microchip for use in parking applications, as ride tokens, in the leisure industry, as ski passes, and for industrial use; transponders in the form of pre-laminated inlays featuring an embedded microchip for use in the manufacture of electronic passports, contactless chip cards, dual interface cards, smart fobs, labels and tickets; transponders in the form of pre-pressed inlays featuring an embedded antenna for use in the manufacture of dual interface cards and contactless cards or fobs, transponders in the form of subcutaneously implanted encoded devices for use in identification of animals; transponders in the form of nail tags featuring an embedded microchip for use in the identification of trees, telegraph poles and similar objects as well as for use in the fine art industry for identifying works of art and identifying copies of originals and restored works of art; transponders in the form of paper smart labels featuring an embedded microchip for use in supply chain management applications, production control, baggage identification, express parcel and cargo services and anti counterfeiting applications; transponders in the form of adhesive labels featuring an embedded microchip for use in industrial gas-bottle identification; encoding devices and reader devices, namely, tags and readers for all of the aforementioned goods; computer software applications embedded in and used in connection with the aforementioned goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2008 |
| 042 | Providing computer programming services, development and implementation of customized computer software applications and for the operation of encodable radio frequency identification products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Micromechanic and Automation Technology
- Other trademarks owned by FEINICS AMATECH TEORANTA
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Micromechanic and Automation Technology
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Micromechanic and Automation Technology
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AMATECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |