USPTO serial 77066475
SOUTH HAMPTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOUTH HAMPTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rocco S. Barrese
ROCCO S BARRESE Dilworth & Barrese, LLP1000 Woodbury Road, Suite 405Woodbury, NY 11797UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | shoulder bags, brief bags, attache cases, brief cases, brief-case-type portfolios, athletic bags, gym bags, travel bags, handbags, drawstring pouches, cloth pouches, cloth reticules and purses | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |