USPTO serial 77068653
OPTIMIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOVELACE, JAMES B
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTIMIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Joseph Schaeff
B. Joseph Schaeff DINSMORE & SHOHL LLPOne Dayton Centre, One South Main StreetSuite 1300Dayton, OH 45402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | (Based on Intent to Use) Formulations for medical purposes in the nature of wound care preparations useful in electrohydrodynamic and electrostatic apparatuses, formulated to produce a Taylor cone which can create sprays, particles, droplets, aerosols, and structures, namely, films, filaments, fibers and webs for inhalation in the nose or lung, pill format, or topical drug delivery for medical treatment of wounds, such as those caused by burns, incision or injury; formulations sold as an integral component of pesticides for use in pesticide delivery in the nature of formulations useful in electrohydrodynamic and electrostatic apparatuses, formulated to produce a Taylor cone which can create sprays, particles, droplets, aerosols, and structures, namely, films, filaments, fibers and webs for pesticide delivery to control pests on plant, animals and premises; formulations for odor neutralizing in the nature of fragrance formulations useful in electrohydrodynamic and electrostatic apparatuses, formulated to produce a Taylor cone which can create sprays, particles, droplets, aerosols, and structures, namely, films, filaments, fibers and webs for delivery of fragrances for pest control and odor control | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Consumer electronic apparatuses for production of sprays, particles, droplets and aerosols, namely, electrohydrodynamic and electrostatic apparatuses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Battelle Memorial Institute
- Other trademarks owned by Battelle Memorial Institute
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named OPTIMIST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |