Drawing for XTREMEHD

USPTO serial 77070662

XTREMEHD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XTREMEHD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lara Dickey Lewis

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Full line of electronic and mechanical accessories for portable and handheld digital electronic devices, namely, docking stations, stands, battery chargers, battery packs, electrical connectors, wires, cables, component video cables, digital optical cables, analog audio cables, adaptors, wired and wireless audio recorders, radio receivers, radio transmitters, image scanners, video viewers, and media readers; a full line of carrying cases, sacks, and bags, specifically designed for portable and handheld digital electronic devices; and a full line of straps, armbands, lanyards, and clips specially designed for portable and handheld digital electronic devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 23, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 23, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 8, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 16, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 13, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 21, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 20, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 20, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 20, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 20, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 20, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 20, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance