USPTO serial 77084556
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua Tropper
JOSHUA TROPPER BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL BERKOWITZ PCMONARCH PLZ SUITE 16003414 PEACHTREE RDATLANTA, GA 30326| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical syringes | SECTION 37 - CANCELLED | May 15, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2013 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | C37. | CANCELLED SECTION 37-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| May 30, 2013 | ORDR | COURT ORDER RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2009 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 26, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 26, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 5, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |