Drawing for SIMPLE KITCHEN

USPTO serial 77093130

SIMPLE KITCHEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLE KITCHEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda M. Novak

LINDA M. NOVAK FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.PO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043restaurant, bar and catering servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 26, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 25, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 7, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance