USPTO serial 77101984
TECHNOLOGY REVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TECHNOLOGY REVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle A. Massicotte
MICHELLE A. MASSICOTTE NIXON PEABODY LLP100 SUMMER STBOSTON, MA 02110-2131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic publications, namely, downloadable electronic magazines in the fields of infotechnology, biotechnology, nanotechnology, computers, computer science, the Internet, energy, entrepreneurship, science, industry, business development and growth, business strategies, product research and development, environmental research, privacy and security, pharmaceuticals, medicine, cultural issues, economic issues, healthcare, telecommunications, transportation, government, aviation, aerospace, and emerging technologies; downloadable electronic newsletters in the fields of infotechnology, biotechnology, nanotechnology, computers, computer science, the Internet, energy, entrepreneurship, science, industry, business development and growth, business strategies, product research and development, environmental research, privacy and security, pharmaceuticals, medicine, cultural issues, economic issues, healthcare, telecommunications, transportation, government, aviation, aerospace, and emerging technologies | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Magazines in the fields of infotechnology, biotechnology, nanotechnology, computers, computer science, the Internet, energy, entrepreneurship, science, industry, business development and growth, business strategies, product research and development, environmental research, privacy and security, pharmaceuticals, medicine, cultural issues, economic issues, healthcare, telecommunications, transportation, government, aviation, aerospace, and emerging technologies; newsletters in the fields of infotechnology, biotechnology, nanotechnology, computers, computer science, the Internet, energy, entrepreneurship, science, industry, business development and growth, business strategies, product research and development, environmental research, privacy and security, pharmaceuticals, medicine, cultural issues, economic issues, healthcare, telecommunications, transportation, government, aviation, aerospace, and emerging technologies | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Developing, arranging, and conducting exhibitions, educational conferences, seminars, forums, educational workshops, and networking events, all for business, commercial, educational, and entertainment purposes, in the fields of infotechnology, biotechnology, nanotechnology, computers, computer science, the Internet, energy, entrepreneurship, science, industry, business development and growth, business strategies, product research and development, environmental research, privacy and security, pharmaceuticals, medicine, cultural issues, economic issues, healthcare, telecommunications, transportation, government, aviation, aerospace, and emerging technologies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |