Drawing for SECURITIES INSURANCE

USPTO serial 77111272

SECURITIES INSURANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SECURITIES INSURANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David H. Chervitz

David H. Chervitz The Mueller Law Office, P.C.12951 Harwick LaneSan Diego, CA 92130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Investment adviceACTIVEJul 18, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 4, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 4, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 4, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 7, 2008GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2008GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 7, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 3, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 3, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 4, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 4, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 16, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance