USPTO serial 77125753
SIMPLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIMPLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gangnam-gu, Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
RICHARD Y. KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP600 13TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunication cables; coaxial cables; cables for electrical or optical signal transmission lines; coaxial cable for minimizing signal leakage in optical signal transmissions lines; optical cables; power cables; electric wires; power wires; electronic and optical receivers for telecommunication cable transmission lines; junction boxes; communication machines and parts thereof, namely, electronic signal and optical transmitters, amplifiers, multiplexers, and electronic controllers; electric connectors; connecting devices, namely, cable connectors, telephone connectors, and connectors for electronic circuits for data transmission lines; integrated circuit modules for data transmission lines in the telecommunications field; electronic machines, namely, telecommunications control panels, electronic indicator panels, and telecommunications cable distribution panels, and parts thereof; structured cabling system consisting of cables and connectors, patch cords and patch panels for integrating voice, data and video management systems of buildings for telecommunications, safety, security, and energy purposes; modular jacks for data transmission lines in the telecommunications field; electric jumper cords; optical fiber cable connectors; electrical power systems for intercommunication in the telecommunications field consisting of distribution panels, distribution boards and distribution boxes; electric switches; anti-interference devices for use with data transmission lines in the telecommunications field; integrated circuits; printed circuits; and insulated copper electrical wire | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |