Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77135323?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77135323. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns WETTECHNOLOGIES?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77135323, the listed owner(s) include: Wet Technologies, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 77135323?

Serial number 77135323 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark WETTECHNOLOGIES. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of WETTECHNOLOGIES?

WETTECHNOLOGIES (77135323) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover WETTECHNOLOGIES?

The public record lists International Classes: 007, 037, 040. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77135323

WETTECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Mar 20, 2007
Status date: Oct 3, 2012
Registration date: —
Examiner: LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WETTECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Wet Technologies, Inc.
Holbrook, NY
Other trademarks owned by Wet Technologies, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Glenn J. Wurzel

GLENN J WURZEL LAW OFFICES OF GLENN J WURZEL62 NICHOLS COURT SUITE 303HEMPSTEAD, NY 11550-3169UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
007	Particle blast cleaning machines; machine tools for water blasting, descaling, derusting, wet lapping, wet peening, slurry processing, and deburring; wet etching machines	ACTIVE	Jun 1, 1999
037	Rust removal	ACTIVE	Jun 1, 1999
040	Water blasting services; particle blasting services; metal finishing; wet peening; slurry processing; wet etching of metals; wet lapping; processing of metals, namely, mechanical descaling	ACTIVE	Jun 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Oct 24, 2012	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Oct 3, 2012	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Oct 3, 2012	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jul 20, 2012	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Jul 2, 2012	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Feb 17, 2011	RBFT	REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES	—
Jan 18, 2011	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED	—
Jan 14, 2011	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Nov 16, 2010	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Sep 16, 2010	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Sep 16, 2010	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Sep 14, 2010	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Sep 14, 2010	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 10, 2010	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Mar 15, 2010	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED	—
Mar 15, 2010	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED	—
Mar 15, 2010	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	—
Feb 22, 2010	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Feb 22, 2010	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Feb 16, 2010	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Sep 24, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2009	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Aug 10, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 7, 2009	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Mar 25, 2009	CPRA	PRIORITY ACTION MAILED	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 24, 2009	CPRA	PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 3, 2009	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Mar 3, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 2, 2009	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Sep 17, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2008	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Aug 27, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 22, 2008	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jul 23, 2008	CNCF	CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	—
Jul 22, 2008	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jun 26, 2008	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jun 26, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 23, 2008	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jan 18, 2008	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2008	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2007	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Dec 19, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 19, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Nov 8, 2007	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jul 5, 2007	CEAP	EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED	—
Jul 5, 2007	CPEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED	—
Jun 28, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Mar 24, 2007	MDSM	NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED	—
Mar 23, 2007	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—