USPTO serial 77166911
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Duy thai
351 CALIFORNIA ST STE 550SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2421UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Portable electronic storage and playback devices, namely, audio and video players, and mobile phones; computer hardware and software for digital rights management; electronic storage and playback devices, namely, audio and video players, and mobile phones, with digital rights management; portable media players with digital rights management; digital computer storage devices in the nature of flash drives, mp3 players, digital video recorders and players, and mobile phones, with digital rights management; computer hardware and software for distributing digital content with digital rights management; computer hardware and software for downloading, storing and playing audio and video entertainment content; home theater hardware in the nature of digital video recorders and software for downloading, storing and playing audio and video entertainment content with digital rights management; computer hardware and software for programming, producing, packaging, storing, distributing and playing multimedia content | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |