Drawing for ETHERMIRROR

USPTO serial 77173948

ETHERMIRROR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ETHERMIRROR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary E. Cabanski

120 Constitution DriveMenlo Park, CA 94025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Ethernet network termination, aggregation, and switching equipment, namely, hardware and software for utilizing Ethernet, DSL, PDH, and SONET/SDH to deliver voice, data, and Ethernet servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 15, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 15, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 2, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 2, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 2, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 30, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 30, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 17, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance