Drawing for CHEF JEFF

USPTO serial 77178236

CHEF JEFF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANOR, THOMAS M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEF JEFF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Cookware, namely, pots and pans and food preparation wares, namely, non-electric griddles, non-electric steamers, non-electric woks, spatulas, serving tongs; utensils for barbecues, namely, forks, tongs and turners; mixing spoons; serving spoons; slotted spoons; cooking forks; pasta serving forks; serving forks; non-electric juicers; and non-electric food blendersACTIVE—
041Education services, namely, providing live and on-line lectures and employment training in the field of cooking and hospitality; consulting services in the field of culinary competitionsACTIVE—
043Consulting services in the field of culinary artsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 15, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 5, 2009NEWNNEW NOA TO ISSUE—
Nov 5, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 3, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2009IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Feb 24, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 27, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 27, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 17, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 4, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 2, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 1, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 30, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2008MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2008RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 3, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance