CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BAR HOPPING

USPTO serial 77193832

BAR HOPPING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAR HOPPING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, providing classes in the field of exercise and fitness facilitated by patterned jumping over a bar or other stationary objectACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2010PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Feb 2, 2010PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 2, 2010APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 20, 2010PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 20, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 24, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 24, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 21, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 26, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 25, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2008PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 28, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 28, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 25, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 17, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 17, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance