USPTO serial 77206602
RIVENDELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIVENDELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carole F. Barrett
CAROLE F. BARRETT HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK & RABKIN,THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather sold in bulk and leather imitations, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes, namely, animal skins and hides; trunks and traveling bags; animal leashes; umbrellas; parasols; walking sticks; whips; harness and saddlery; luggage; bags, namely, all purpose carrying bags; cases sold empty, namely, all purpose carrying cases, business cases, document cases, key cases, leather cases and train cases; sports bags; duffel bags; garment bags for travel; gym bags; all-purpose sports gear carrying bags; athletic bags; attaché cases; baby backpacks; backpacks; bandoliers; beach bags; beach umbrellas; billfolds; book bags; brief cases; business card cases; canes; cane handles; name card cases; calling card cases; carry-on bags; coin and change purses; fanny packs; hand bags; hat boxes for travel not of paper or cardboard; luggage tags; knapsacks; leather, mesh and textile shopping bags; purses; wallets; credit card cases; rucksacks; satchels; suitcases; thongs, namely, thin leather strips; toiletry cases sold empty; tote bags; walking canes for non-medical purposes; waist packs; travel bags; shoe bags for travel; school bags; pet collars not made of metal; identification tags not made of metal, namely, leather and imitation leather identification tags; messenger bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |