USPTO serial 77210400
G-WIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4577903Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 5, 2014
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with G-WIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hallie A. Finucane
Hallie A. Finucane Westman, Champlin & Koehler, P.A.900 Second Avenue South, Suite 1400Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Apparatus and instruments, namely, medical guided guidewire | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 29, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 7, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |