Drawing for TEASE

USPTO serial 77210558

TEASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TEASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie C. Jennings

JULIE C. JENNINGS SENNIGER POWERS1 METROPOLITAN SQ FL 16SAINT LOUIS, MO 63102-2711UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Communications software which translates text to speech, and which generates wallpaper images, graphics, video, animation, ring tones, music, sound and text for use in association with mobile communications devices such as cell phones, personal digital assistants, electronic wireless handheld units for the receipt and transmission of data and/or voice communications, and computers; computer multimedia application software which translates text to speech, and which provides wallpaper images, graphics, video, animation, ring tones, music, sound and text for use in association with mobile communications devices such as cell phones, personal digital assistants, electronic wireless handheld units for the receipt and transmission of data and/or voice communications, and computers; computer software applications for wireless communications service providers that allows text messages transmitted between wireless communications subscribers to be converted into speech and generates wallpaper images, graphics, video, animation, ring tones, music, sound and text in association with wireless communications subscribers' mobile communications devices such as cell phones, personal digital assistants, electronic wireless handheld units for the receipt and transmission of data and/or voice communications, and computersACTIVE—
038Wireless communications services, namely, wireless electronic text-to-speech messaging services and the transmission of images, graphics, video, animation, music, sound and text to mobile communications devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 13, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 18, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 18, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance