Drawing for VILLA BORGHESE

USPTO serial 77224978

VILLA BORGHESE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VILLA BORGHESE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Baker

STEPHEN L. BAKER BAKER AND RANNELLS PA575 ROUTE 28RARITAN, NJ 08869-1354UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Bath gloves; Bath linen; Bath mitts; Bath sheets; Bath towels; Bed blankets; Bed canopies; Bed linen; Bed pads; Bed sheets; Bed skirts; Bed spreads; Blanket throws; Comforters; Coverlets; Dust ruffles; Duvet covers; Duvets; Feather beds; Fitted toilet lid covers; Handkerchiefs; Household linen; Kitchen linens; Mattress covers; Mattress pads; Pillow cases; Pillow covers; Pillow shams; Quilts; Shams; Shower curtains; Throws; Towels; Washcloths; Washing glovesPARTIALLY PAID—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 3, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 2, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 29, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 22, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 22, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2007RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Oct 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance