USPTO serial 77245484
SK8
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SK8?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELIZABETH N. BILUS
ELIZABETH N. BILUS PEPSICO, INC.700 ANDERSON HILL RDPURCHASE, NY 10577-1444UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | (Based on Intent to Use) Processed nuts; Processed edible seeds; Dried fruits; Snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; Fruit chips; Potato chips; Soy chips; Vegetable chips;Fruit-based snack food;Protein based, nutrient-dense snack bars; Fruit-based organic food bars; Soy-based food bars;Organic nut and seed-based snack bars; Processed fruit- and nut-based food bars | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | (Based on Intent to Use) Corn chips; Pita chips; Tortilla chips; Pretzels; Popcorn;Grain-based food bars also containing dried fruits, chocolates, nuts and/or seeds;Breakfast cereals; Granola | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE CONCENTRATE MANUFACTURING COMPANY OF IRELAND
- Other trademarks owned by THE CONCENTRATE MANUFACTURING COMPANY OF IRELAND
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SK8
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2008 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 12, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |