USPTO serial 77259123
LIFTONIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 22, 2009
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with LIFTONIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Zurich, CH
Zurich, CH
Zurich, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chelsea VanderWoude
Chelsea VanderWoude GROSSMAN, TUCKER, PERREAULT & PFLEGER, PLLC55 S. Commercial Street, B14Manchester, NH 03101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical additives for use in the manufacture of Cosmetics | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2003 |
| 003 | [ After-sun gels; After-sun milks; ] [ After-sun oils; Aloe vera gel for cosmetic purposes; Astringents for cosmetic purposes; Bath oils for cosmetic purposes; ] [ Body and beauty care cosmetics; ] [ Cleansing creams; ] [ Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic milks; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic oils for the epidermis; Cosmetic pads; ] [ Cosmetic pencils; ] [ Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; Cosmetic products in the form of aerosols for skin care; ] [ Cosmetic soaps; Cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; Cosmetic sun-tanning preparations; Cosmetic suntan lotions; ] [ Face creams for cosmetic use; ] [ Tanning gels; Tanning milks; Tanning oils; ] [ Tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; Topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2019 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 24, 2019 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 14, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 13, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |