USPTO serial 77266148
SPOTLIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4103417Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 28, 2012
- Examiner
- LOVELACE, JAMES B
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPOTLIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica B. Richman
Monica B. Richman Dentons US LLPP.O. Box #061080Chicago, IL 60606-1080UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Computer hardware and peripherals, namely, global wireless networking products; ] computer software for the activation and operation of wireless telecommunication services, namely, for mobile network optimization; [ mobile phones; personal music players, namely, MP3, audio cassette, and CD players; wireless handheld devices, namely, handheld computers for web browsing; ] local area network (LAN) operating software [ and hardware ] ; [ computer memory hardware for telecommunications; memory boards for telecommunications; computer hardware, namely, memory cards for telecommunications; computer hardware for connecting to communication networks; computer software for the activation and operation of wireless telecommunication services, namely, for mobile network optimization; ] computer [ hardware and ] software for processing, storing and communicating data relating to the operation, activation, performance, coverage, and interference of wireless telecommunication services and networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | [ cellular radio telecommunications services, namely, providing communications value added network (van) electronic transmission services, namely, mobile network optimization services; consultation and advisory services relating to communications by mobile phone, namely, mobile network optimization services ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Professional technical consultation and technical advisory services relating to computers, computer systems and computer software, namely, mobile phones and mobile network optimization software; ] design and development of computer software, namely, mobile network optimization software; [ development of mobile phones; ] computer programming in the field of wireless telecommunications networks, namely, mobile network optimization software; leasing and rental of [ computers, computer systems, ] computer programs, and computer software, namely, mobile network optimization systems and mobile network optimization software; [ updating of computer software for wireless telecommunications networks, namely, mobile network optimization software, for others, all for the telecommunications industry; ] installation [, maintenance and repair ] of computer software for wireless telecommunication networks, namely, mobile network optimization software [ ; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of wireless telecommunication networks, namely, mobile network optimization software, all for the mobile telecommunications industry; technical research in the field of computer software, namely, mobile network optimization software, all for the mobile telephone industry ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Actix Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Actix Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Actix Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SPOTLIGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 28, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | 44EG | 44(e) PETITION - GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2007 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 8, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 8, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |