USPTO serial 77266389
THAI GOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THAI GOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | (Based on Intent to Use) Coconut oil; Coconut oil and fat; Coconut powder; Desiccated coconut; Flaked coconut; Prepared coconut; Processed coconut; Rice milk for use as a milk substitute;Pre-packaged dinners consisting of meat and vegetables with rice and or noodles; Rice bran oil | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Chinese rice noodles (bifun, uncooked); Dried cooked-rice; Husked rice; Pounded rice cakes (mochi); Puffed rice; Rice; Rice and seasoning mix combined in unitary packages; Rice cakes; Rice crackers; Rice flour; Rice noodles; Rice starch flour; Rice-based snack foods; Wholemeal rice; Packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Chili paste for use as a seasoning; Chili powders; Chili sauce; Chili seasoning; Dried chili peppers; Soy bean paste; Soy sauce; Curry; Curry pastes; Curry powder; Bean-starch noodles (harusame, uncooked); Instant noodles; Noodles; Noodles, sauce, and seasoning toppings combined in unitary packages; Barbecue sauce; Dipping sauces; Fish sauce; Sauces; Soy sauce; Savoury and salted biscuits | ACTIVE | Jul 5, 2005 |
| 032 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Coconut milk; Coconut water;Aloe vera drinks; Fruit drinks | ACTIVE | Jul 5, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |