Drawing for MITECH

USPTO serial 77297162

MITECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILLER, DAVID S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MITECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

HOWARD N. ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLP1 CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583-4156UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Musical board games; toy musical instruments; battery operated action toys; electronic action toys, electronic learning toys, mechanical action toys, radio transmitters for use with radio-controlled toys, remote control toys, namely, robots, cars, airplanes, boats, toy mobiles; toy robots; battery-powered computer game with LCD screen which features animation and sound effectsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 14, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 21, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 16, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 13, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 20, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 20, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2007AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance