USPTO serial 77307480
EZ-UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EZ-UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis F. Wagner
David J. Hrina Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, LLPSuite 300 3800 Embassy ParkwayAkron, OH 44333-8332UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | High performance self-supporting vertical antenna systems for amateur radio operators comprising high performance self-supporting vertical antennas and antenna support structures for amateur radio operators | ABANDONED | Sep 7, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |