Drawing for SONA GAMING

USPTO serial 77333389

SONA GAMING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERRERA-MARCUS, ROSELLE MORALDE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SONA GAMING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KIMBERLY STEIN

KIMBERLY STEIN SONA MOBILE, INC.10100 WEST CHARLESTON BLVD.SUITE 160LAS VEGAS, NV 89135

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic wireless gaming systems, namely, a server based video display board; Electronic gambling gaming system comprised of electronic kiosks and personal computers; wireless handheld video display boards and electronic gambling gaming devices, namely, personal digital assistants and cellular phones for use in selecting and playing video games; computer software and hardware for determining what to wager on, how much to wager, how to wager on and placing wagers on games of chance and sports on any computerized platform; electronic game software for wireless and wired devices; and instruction manuals for use therewith, all sold as a unitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 11, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 2, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 22, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance