Drawing for POWAKADDY EDGE

USPTO serial 77338991

POWAKADDY EDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRATER, JILL I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWAKADDY EDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carole F. Barrett

CAROLE F. BARRETT HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK & RABKINTHREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Batteries for motorized golf trolleys and golf carts, trolleys and buggies; batteries; distance measuring apparatus; electronic devices, apparatus and instruments for calculating data; electronic devices, apparatus and instruments incorporating a global positioning systems (GPS) for calculating dataACTIVE—
012Transporters for use in sporting activities; motorized golf carts, caddies and trolleysACTIVE—
028Sporting equipment and accessories, all for use in the game of golf, namely, golf bags; non-motorized golf carts, caddies and trolleysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 25, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 25, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 30, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 7, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 3, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 25, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance