USPTO serial 77339124
SLIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SLIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelena Hallie
Michelle Lee VIACOM INTERNATIONAL1515 BROADWAY34TH FLOOR C/O DIANE MANTARINGNEW YORK, NY 10036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | HOUSEHOLD AND KITCHEN UTENSILS, NAMELY, BEVERAGEWARE, MUGS, BOWLS, CUPS, DISHES, MUGS, PAPER CUPS, PAPER PLATES, PLASTIC CUPS, PLATES, SPATULAS, WHISKS, SERVING FORKS, SERVING SPOONS, AND ROLLING PINS; KITCHEN ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, TEA KETTLES, COOKIE JARS, CAKE PANS, CAKE MOLDS, CAKE SERVERS, PIE PANS, PIE SERVERS, COOKIE CUTTERS, SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS, SERVING PLATTERS, GLASS BOWLS, SALAD BOWLS; KITCHEN SUPPLIES, NAMELY, CORK SCREWS, TRIVETS, LUNCH KITS CONSISTING OF LUNCH BOXES AND INSULATED BEVERAGE CONTAINERS, AND BROOMS; AND HOMEWARE, NAMELY, SOAP DISHES, TOOTHBRUSHES, HAIR BRUSHES, HAIR COMBS, WASTE BASKETS, ALL-PURPOSE PORTABLE HOUSEHOLD CONTAINERS, FIGURINES MADE OF CHINA, CRYSTAL, EARTHENWARE, GLASS, OR PORCELAIN, FLOWER POTS, CANDLE HOLDERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, DECORATIVE PLATES, MEAL TRAYS, COASTERS NOT OF PAPER AND NOT BEING TABLE LINEN, PLASTIC COASTER, NAPKIN HOLDERS, NAPKIN RINGS NOT OF PRECIOUS METALS, ICE BUCKETS, COOLERS FOR WINE, WINE DECANTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |