USPTO serial 77344714
MC SKAT KAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MC SKAT KAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Teresa Lee
Teresa A. Lee, Esq. Pryor Cashman LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of live animated character musical and dance performances; entertainment services in the nature of musical theatre; entertainment in the nature of live performances by a musical artist or musical group; entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances by a musical artist or musical group; entertainment, namely, live music concert and dance performances; live performances featuring prerecorded vocal and dance performances viewed on a big screen; music composition and transcription for others; song writing services; music publishing services; record production; music production; audio recording and production; videotape production; motion picture song production; production of video discs for others; recording studios; entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of musical audio and video television and radio programs; production and distribution of musical audio and video television and radio recordings for broadcast; planning arrangement of showing movies, shows, plays or musical performances; entertainment, namely, personal appearances by a musician, recording artist, dancer, celebrity, television star or entertainment personality; entertainment services namely live, televised and movie appearances by a professional entertainer; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, animation, dance performances, photographs, and other multimedia materials; entertainment services, namely, providing prerecorded music, animation, dance performances, information in the field of music, dance and the arts, commentary and articles about music, dance, and the arts, all online via a global computer network; television show and cable television show production; radio entertainment production; motion picture film production; provision of non-downloadable films and television programs via a video-on-demand service; film editing; special effects animation services for film and video; entertainment in the nature of on-going television, cable television and radio programs featuring music, comedy, dramatic acts and spoken word; television and cable television programs featuring music, dance, animation, documentaries, reality shows, and comedy; providing a variety show distributed over television, cable television, radio, satellite, audio and video media; theatre productions; entertainment in the nature of live traveling tours by a professional entertainer featuring music, dance, drama, spoken word and comedy; entertainment services, namely, presenting non-downloadable ringtones, pre-recorded music, video and graphics to mobile communications devices via a global computer network and wireless networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 27, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 27, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |