Drawing for PROPHET EQUITY

USPTO serial 77356026

PROPHET EQUITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROPHET EQUITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda M. Novak

LINDA M NOVAK FISH & RICHARDSON PCPO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Private equity fund investment services; Management of private equity fundsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 25, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 24, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 24, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 19, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 8, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 7, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 7, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 18, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 7, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 7, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 27, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance