Drawing for GARDEN TRADITIONS

USPTO serial 77358100

GARDEN TRADITIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GARDEN TRADITIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ

SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2218UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal garden stakes; metal wire fencing; metal garden hose accessories, namely, hose couplings and connectors; and screenhouses, namely, prefabricated and portable metal screen enclosures; plant and garden ornament hangers, namely, metal shepherd hooks; hanging works of art made of metalACTIVE—
011Decorative and ornamental water fountainsACTIVE—
018Patio and lawn umbrellasACTIVE—
020Outdoor furniture, namely, tables, chairs, and chaises, patio sets, bar and bistro sets; non-metal garden stakes; hanging works of art made of resin and/or plastic; garden ornaments made of resin and/or plastic; whirligig garden ornaments, namely, wind operated/powered figures of resin and/or plasticACTIVE—
021Garden hose accessories, namely, hose couplers and connectors, hose nozzles, sprayers, and sprayer wands, and lawn water sprinklers; bird baths and bird houses; garden ornaments made of terra cotta; metal garden hose accessories, namely, lawn water sprinklers and nozzlesACTIVE—
031Grass seedACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 22, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 22, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 22, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 14, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 22, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 22, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 22, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 30, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 10, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 22, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 18, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 18, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 18, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 18, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 13, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 3, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 22, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 20, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 13, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 30, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 26, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 26, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 26, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 25, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 25, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 25, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 26, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance