Drawing for ROVER

USPTO serial 77420325

ROVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marshall J. Nelson

MARSHALL J. NELSON DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1201 3RD AVESTE 2200SEATTLE, WA 98101-3045

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing information via computer networks in the fields of news and entertainment, namely, movies, theater, music, sports, celebrity personalities, current events; providing theater listings; providing a website featuring listings and news regarding television programming; providing information relating to computer games; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, film clips, celebrity interviews, talk shows, television show previews, photographs, and other multimedia materials featuring news and entertainment, namely, movies, theater, music, sports, celebrity personalities, current events; providing prerecorded music, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all via computer networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 25, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 23, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 23, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 23, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 11, 2010ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 25, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 7, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 24, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 15, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 14, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 10, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 19, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 27, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 24, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance