USPTO serial 77431034
Serial No. 77431034
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 77431034?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dr. Marcus A. Ernst
DR. MARCUS A. ERNST ERNST & LINDER LLC17 BATTERY PL STE 1307NEW YORK, NY 10004-1059UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, namely self-propelled machines for composting various feedstock like green waste, organic residuals, sludge, agricultural wastes, product of soil and substrata, FOR treatment of dredged material, FOR blending soils, FOR mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste, FOR bioremediation and recultivation in Class 7; Machines, namely agricultural machines for composting various feedstock like green waste, organic residuals, sludge, agricultural wastes, product of soil and substrata, FOR treatment of dredged material, FOR blending soils, FOR mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste, AND FOR bioremediation and recultivation in Class 7; Parts for self-propelled machines for composting various feedstock like green waste, organic residuals, sludge, agricultural wastes, product of soil and substrata, FOR treatment of dredged material, FOR blending soils, FOR mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste, AND FOR bioremediation and recultivation in Class 7; Parts for agricultural machines for composting various feedstock like green waste, organic residuals, sludge, agricultural wastes, product of soil and substrata, FOR treatment of dredged material, FOR blending soils, FOR mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste, AND FOR bioremediation and recultivation in Class 7 | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of machines, namely self-propelled machines, mechanical devices and equipment for composting and green cutting of bio waste, product of soil and substrata, FOR treatment of dredged material, sludge treatment, FOR treatment of organic residuals, FOR treatment of agricultural waste, FOR mechanical-biological treatment of municipal soil waste, FOR bio remediation, re-cultivation, soil decontamination and soil blending in Class 37; Maintenance and repair of machines, namely automotive machines, mechanical devices, and equipment for composting, soil decontamination, and soil blending in Class 37 | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Practical training, in particular in respect to counseling expertise in the field of composting, waste compacting and conveying, process engineering and sales skills | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |